• Home
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Guest Writer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy

GovCon Network

The Government Contractors Network

  • Research
  • Reference
    • Government Contracting Books
    • Glossary
    • GovCon Guides
      • GovCon – A Free Guide
        • Government Contracting Guide Appendix A Cost Estimates
        • Government Contracting Guide Appendix B Long Range Plan
      • GovCon 101
        • GovCon 101 – Part 2
        • GovCon 101 – Part 3
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact
  • Webinars
You are here: Home / All / When The Shoe Doesn’t Fit

When The Shoe Doesn’t Fit

November 18, 2014 by Anthony Cooch

How To Respond to a Bulky Statement of Work

Streamline a statement of workArticle by Ellen Perrine of AOC Key Solutions

It seems that the trend in Requests for Proposals (RFPs) these days is to provide prospective offerors with a voluminous Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) and then give them minimal page count in which to address it in the proposal. Here are a few approaches on how to  streamline your proposal and ensure compliance when the shoe simply doesn’t fit!

Determine what is a necessary requirement.

Look for instructions in the RFP to see whether any language that specifically addresses how much of the SOW or PWS must be addressed. Sometimes Section L contains language stating that addressing all SOW or PWS elements is not a requirement. In this case, you can explain your technical approach in the form of a higher level discussion of the major SOW or PWS elements without providing all the details of each sub-element and still be compliant. You can address individual sub-elements that are an integral part of the approach using embedded reference numbers to highlight where they are discussed, so that they can be easily identified by evaluators, or you can highlight some of the key words in bold text (use this latter approach only if the proposal is very short, however, because text with too many highlighted words is exhausting to read).

What if you aren’t able to eliminate some SOW/PWS elements?

If all SOW/PWS elements must be addressed, you have a major challenge. Review your page count for the proposal and determine how many pages you can allocate to the SOW/PWS. Look for ways to streamline/tighten other proposal sections to free up additional space. Eliminating transitional clauses between sentences that don’t add value, redundancies, and extraneous details or information not specifically asked for will make it read better anyway! Then review the number of SOW/PWS elements you have and decide which ones are the most important based on your knowledge of the customer’s needs and wants and their importance as reflected in the RFP. For example, section 5.2, Acquisition Support in an acquisition support RFP will require a more detailed response than section 5.9, Training. Then, write to the major headings and provide tables that contain all of the sub-elements, concisely stating that you will perform the task, and where the “how” is important to the customer, state briefly how you will do it. Combine “like” items together wherever it makes sense to save space.


 

About Ellen Perrine

Ellen PerrineEllen Perrine is a Vice President at AOC Key Solutions with more than 25 years of experience in federal proposals including strategy development, proposal management, compliance management, and technical writing.

This article originally appeared on the AOC Key Solutions Blog and is reprinted with their permission.

Filed Under: All, KSI

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Subscribe to receive updates

Stay Connected

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

GovCon Network’s Facebook Page

GovCon Network’s Facebook Page

© Copyright 2020 GovCon Network · All Rights Reserved